Waiver Not Good Enough to Protect Stables, Judges Rule

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, an appeals court has ruled that a waiver signed by a woman injured on a horseback ride was too ambiguous to absolve the stables from responsibility. The judge ruled that the woman's personal injury lawsuit could proceed, even though the woman had already received a settlement  from the stables for an undisclosed sum. The appeals court opinion was published as a precedent for future cases. The San Francisco Chronicle reported that the woman was thrown from her horse when it unexpectedly bolted, and received cuts and bruises.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.