Jury Rejects Arguments in Rectal Exam Case

The New York Daily News reports that a jury has rejected a construction worker's argument that a rectal exam he unwillingly underwent at a hospital emergency room was tantamount to assault and battery. The 38-year-old man was hit in the head with a 40-pound  piece of wood while working at a construction site, and was brought to New York Presbyterian Hospital. Attorneys for the hospital and for a physician also named as a defendant in the lawsuit successfully argued that rectal exams are a standard and necessary procedure in examining patients with possible spinal injuries. According to the New York Daily News, the Manhattan jury deliberated for only an hour before reaching its verdict.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.